87°F
weather icon Clear

Presumption of innocence doesn’t apply to Brett Kavanaugh allegations

Review-Journal cartoonist Michael Ramirez and syndicated cartoonist Steve Kelley imply the consideration of an unproven accusation against Judge Brett Kavanaugh violates the presumption of innocence principle. Presumption of innocence applies to criminal proceedings, and no one — to my knowledge — has instituted such a proceeding.

Almost all of the information used to judged nominees for the Supreme Court (as well as for other positions) has not been proven in court. While I do not know if the accusation against him is valid, I believe it should be taken seriously, researched and evaluated. It shouldn’t be swept under the rug in a rush to get the nomination done before the next election.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: A dangerous combination

Donald Trump and Sam Brown are extremists. These are two men who would sooner throw your vote away if it’s not for them.

LETTER: Missing the mark

These so-called CBO budget experts, if in the private sector, would be put out on the streets for their incompetence.

LETTER: Just sign here

Isn’t it fascinating that signatures are excruciatingly validated and litigated when it comes to appearing on the ballot, but ignored once the actual voting takes place?

LETTER: Investing in news

Review-Journal interns offer hope.

LETTER: Glass houses

Both sides of the road are filled with potholes of corruption.

LETTER: Trump owes an apology

Trump has never conceded. There is no proof that the election was illegitimate or voter fraud was an issue. Where is his and his party’s apology?