60°F
weather icon Clear

Pipeline a threat to our natural heritage

To the editor:

An editorial in Thursday’s Review-Journal speculated that the only reason that the Center for Biological Diversity and others are seeking protections for 32 species of springsnails is to stop the proposed Southern Nevada Water Authority groundwater pipeline.

Such is not the case.

If the pipeline could be constructed and operated so as to not wreak environmental havoc, the center would have no cause to oppose it.

This is not the case.

More than 310 springs, 125 miles of year-round streams, 8,000 acres of wetlands and 192,000 acres of sage and other shrublands will be severely damaged or destroyed by the impact from the groundwater pumping. The very natural heritage of Nevada and the Great Basin is under attack by this project. Not only would the 32 species of springsnails be destroyed, sage grouse, rare desert fish and even iconic game species such as mule deer, elk, pronghorn antelope and bighorn sheep would be devastated. Beyond a doubt, some species would go extinct.

These springsnails have been on this landscape for thousands of years, playing a vital role in improving water quality by consuming decaying matter and algae. They’re also an important food source for fish, birds and amphibians.

Bottom line: Even though they’re hard to spot, they have intrinsic value in the places they live.

The mission of the center is to work through science, law and advocacy to be a voice for rare species when human policies and actions threaten their existence. It is not the pipeline we oppose, it is sending species to extinction that we oppose.

Rob Mrowka

North Las Vegas

The writer is an ecologist working for the Center for Biological Diversity as the conservation advocate for the state of Nevada.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
MORE STORIES
THE LATEST
LETTER: Guns in the home for protection

Most law-abiding American citizens do not know whether they or a family member will ever have to come face to face with an evil person.

LETTER: LA fires and linguistic precision

“Seeing is believing” would have been a more appropriate headline. When you see the extent of the devastation, you begin to believe how horrific it has been.

LETTER: Trump opposed steel merger, too

Incoming President Donald Trump is against the merger too. So both the present and incoming administrations agreed on no merger.

LETTER: Trump talks like his favorite dictator

America made a mistake voting Putin’s pal into power. Democrats are not as insane as Republicans. The future is not looking bright for our country.

LETTER: Dave Barry’s year-ender was a hoot

Looking back on 2024. I am saving it to reread when I need a real “pick me up” in the coming months.

LETTER: Victims of LA fires will face issues

The California government’s red tape bureaucracy will be mind-numbing and unimaginably frustrating for those who lost everything.

LETTER: Finger pointing over the California fires

Finger pointed and accusations just lead people to not trust anyone, even if they’re being helped. Why does this tragedy need to be a political issue?