92°F
weather icon Mostly Clear

LETTER: Progressives and unintended consequences

In reference to Victor Joecks’ March 29 column on the ramifications of liberal policies, it isn’t that progressives ignore what happens next. It’s just that the reactions they anticipate have no basis in reality. They see everyone coming together to sing “Kumbaya” and engage in group hugs, thanks to our benevolent leaders who have the wisdom to show us the error of our ways and direct us to the path of enlightenment. They think all of their changes will automatically make things rosy for everyone.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren once commented on gun violence that, “If they see no one is shooting back at them, they will lay down their weapons and surrender. That’s just human nature.” I’m not sure what humans she’s been around, but they aren’t any of the ones who will start shooting in a “gun-free” zone.

Progressives need to adjust to reality and understand the changes they want will have an effect, but just not the ones they expect. The law of unintended consequences has been brought into play so many times, one would think they would understand. But I guess that’s my problem, thinking that progressives can see beyond their own agenda.

LISTEN TO THE TOP FIVE HERE
SPONSORED BY DIMOPOULOS LAW FIRM
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Biden confused over inflation.

All this mismanagement has resulted in the national debt rising at a very alarming rate.

LETTER: Still after the Jan. 6 protesters

So more than three years after the riot, the government is still using taxpayer money and manpower in its vendetta to ferret out Donald Trump supporters.

LETTER: Columbia kids need to learn to pay their own way

Frankly, if I had kids at Columbia who participated in these “protests,” I’d yank them out of school, toss their stuff onto the lawn and tell them to get a job, go live in the real world and pay your own way.

LETTER: Here’s the real threat to democracy

In the 2020 election, Mr. Biden ran on promises he has failed to keep. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

LETTER: No need for an SOS on Social Security

The functional reality is that members of Congress need to keep Social Security alive or they will be voted out of office.