77°F
weather icon Clear

LETTER: Gov. Sisolak too reactive on COVID

Once again, Nevada finds itself at the bottom of a list. But this time, last place means taking lives. Gov. Steve Sisolak has no clear plan for the distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine. He is reactive not proactive.

This is not the first time our governor has waited to see what is done in other places. His plan is so filled with verbiage and rhetoric that it is almost impossible to understand. There has never been any presentation of an actual plan for when, where and how the vaccine will be distributed to the general population.

Where have his advisers and task forces been for the past 11 months? There has been plenty of time to formulate a real plan. I hope that these actions, or rather inactions, are being chronicled so that we can recall all of them in the next election.

LISTEN TO THE TOP FIVE HERE
Sponsored By One Nevada Credit Union
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Those dastardly mosquitoes

In the past month, I have shed my human identity and become a walking itch.

LETTER: The carbon-spewing Biden family

Climate change is an existential threat to mankind, animals and plants. Why doesn’t the Biden family lead the way?

LETTER: The Trump show trial

Remember, Martin Luther King, Mahatma Ghandi and Sir Thomas More — all innocent men — were also declared to be guilty.

LETTER: No conspiracy involving Hunter’s laptop

The R-J should acknowledge that Mr. Trump’s lies, frauds, defamations, criminal indictments and convictions are exponentially worse than Hunter’s laptop being evidence or any of the other alleged Biden missteps.

LETTER: Trump tries to win Nevada

Mr. Trump advocating for tax-free tip income is definitely one approach to winning Nevada. But my tip to Mr. Trump is to pick Marco Rubio and show the diversity of the GOP.

LETTER: Red Rock development ‘compromise’ is depressing

Red Rock Canyon is a fragile natural wonder. To claim that 3,500 homes and the traffic that goes with them, and changing the nature of the watershed, will not negatively impact the area is absurd.