61°F
weather icon Cloudy

LETTER: Consider higher housing costs an ‘investment’

The assertion that complying with government regulations adds 23.8 percent to the cost of the average house is a serious misunderstanding of economics when the cost of environmental degradation isn’t accounted for (“Biden’s climate change policy is making housing less affordable,” April 19 e-commentary). Focusing on the cost of energy-efficient building regulations without acknowledging the financial impacts of climate change is short-sighted.

The long-term payoff of energy efficiency standards in construction will not just be in lower energy costs, it will also be in helping to achieve a livable climate. What’s the real price tag of an “affordable” house that’s more vulnerable to devastating storms, floods, heat, wildfires and droughts intensified by a warming climate? Cutting corners today will result in inflated expenses tomorrow as we battle increasing climate emergencies. That’s not affordable for anyone. The cost of inaction is too high.

LISTEN TO THE TOP FIVE HERE
SPONSORED BY BEST MATTRESS
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Giving Donald Trump a pass

Listen to the evidence that will be presented at Donald Trump’s trials before reaching any conclusions. And remember that those giving the most damning testimony will likely be Republicans.

LETTER: Why does Las Vegas keep building houses?

How can we ask the federal government for additional funds to fight the drought when we keep pulling billions of gallons of water out of the Colorado River, which feeds Lake Mead?

LETTER: Highways will go the way of the horse and buggy

I personally can’t wait to give up the soporific scenery, racetrack-like mentality and beautiful Baker bathroom stops of the Interstate 15 car commute in favor of a sleek, smooth train.