86°F
weather icon Clear

Don’t lower DUI limit; stiffen penalties

To the editor:

While I agree with Jerry Ruby’s Friday letter (“Reduce the limit”) about the importance of getting drunks off the road, I don’t agree with the letter’s logic in favor of lowering the blood-alcohol limit from .08 percent to .05 percent.

A legal limit of .08 percent is sufficient. Stiffer penalties must be imposed. Suspend a driver’s license for one year and mandate jail time on a first offense, no deals. On a second offense, loss of license for five years, five years in prison, no deals. If there is a third offense, permanent loss of license and 25 years in prison.

If people knew their actions would result in stiff penalties, there would be a decline in incidents. Enforcement is the key. Until the culture changes and there are stiffer penalties, it won’t matter what the legal limit is.

MARLENE DROZD

LAS VEGAS

Sex trafficking

To the editor:

The people of Nevada have had enough of our children being stolen away from us during their middle and high school years, sometimes never to return.

Sex trafficking of mainly local minors affects Nevadans in every neighborhood across the state. We do not think sex trafficking legislation will wipe out this heinous crime, but we are convinced it will help. We, the people of Nevada, are challenging the Nevada Senate to bring the legislation to the floor and pass it.

The struggle to ensure the passage of sex trafficking legislation (Assembly Bill 67) in Nevada has been lengthy and difficult. Nevertheless, it pales in significance to the daily struggle of sex trafficking victims. There are no words powerful enough to describe the pain, anguish and sheer torture experienced by those who are repeatedly forced into sex acts experience.

Child sex trafficking is the dark, shadowy underbelly of Nevada, a business that makes millions for its perpetrators and generally leaves its victims broken and penniless. Community groups from across the state, including Nevadans for the Common Good, the Religious Alliance in Nevada, Awaken and many others, have joined with businesses to support the bill.

It punishes traffickers more severely while allowing the victims to disengage from them. We are behind the new law on moral grounds, but we are also pragmatic. The state will save money in health care and law enforcement if victims are able to leave the trafficking life. The bill has been carefully debated and amended to ensure it not only provides victims with a chance to escape trafficking, but also protects the legal rights of accused traffickers, which we agree is important.

Survivors, victims, families of victims and their supporters are scrutinizing the senators’ actions. We, the people who support the bill, are not naive. The time has now come to end the debating and amending. Send AB67 to the Senate floor for a vote before the session ends. Pass this bill and take a first step to end this evil in our midst. The clock is ticking, and the people are watching.

Malcolm Cohen

Camille Naaktgeboren

LAS VEGAS

Mr. Cohen is rabbi at Temple Sinai in Las Vegas. Ms. Naaktgeboren is a sex trafficking survivor and a member of Nevadans for the Common Good.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
MORE STORIES
THE LATEST
LETTER: Kamala tries to stay in hiding

It is readily apparent that Ms. Harris does not like or handle spontaneous situations well.

LETTER: The real immigration debate

How should the U.S. go about crafting solutions to immigration that acknowledges the need to uphold our immigration laws while also trying to uphold the spirit of America that has always welcomed immigrants?

LETTER: Hectoring us on road safety

Why on earth do we allow these huge 18-wheelers in the left lanes of our freeways? That’s like having a speeding missile on your back bumper.

LETTER: The invective flies both ways

Where is your editorial on Donald Trump and JD Vance toning down the rhetoric? Or are you tone-deaf to their remarks?

LETTER: The Democratic ‘gift’ to America

What are the people of Springfield to do? Kamala Harris expects these poor citizens to somehow feed, shelter, clothe, medicate and educate the 20,000 uninvited.

LETTER: How about a Trump-Harris trade?

It appears to me that the vice president choices made by Donald Trump and Kamala Harris should be reversed.