86°F
weather icon Clear

Think Onion should live? Get a life

To the editor:

I see where the dog that killed a 1-year-old child was represented at the Nevada Supreme Court (“High court hears arguments over Onion,” Thursday Review-Journal).

What? The dog killed a baby. Dogs don’t comprehend right and wrong. Dogs don’t read and comply with the Nevada Revised Statutes. The dog that killed the baby, if spared euthanization, will not become “saved” or embrace religion. The dog won’t be rehabilitated to redeem itself with a future filled with acts of goodness. The dog killed once, and it shall kill or maim someone in the future.

The folks who have become so obsessed about the fate of this dog should get a life. I cannot understand why anyone would place a dog above a human, baby or adult. The court’s expenditure of taxpayers’ dollars to hear the case to save this dog is absurd.

When I see folks treat their dogs better than humans, I realize the human race is in decline. Our legislators have demonstrated that trait.

WAYNE P. BROTHERTON

AMARGOSA VALLEY

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
MORE STORIES
THE LATEST
LETTER: An alternative to bombing

I am delighted to hear that Mr. Lee may understand that rent control will destroy a city.

LETTER: Donald Trump remains a threat to the republic

There is nothing in Mr. Trump’s behavior as president that compels the conclusion he is not a threat to democracy: just the opposite, actually.

LETTER: Utah lawsuit threatens the concept of public lands

A ruling in favor of Utah’s lawsuit would mark the end of public lands as we know them, opening the floodgates to every anti-public lands politician in the West to seize public lands by way of the courts.

LETTER: Kamala tries to stay in hiding

It is readily apparent that Ms. Harris does not like or handle spontaneous situations well.