I read in the Jan. 1 Review-Journal that one of Nancy Pelosi’s final acts as speaker was to again boost the maximum salary for House staffers. In May, it was increased from $199,300 to $203,700. But that’s not enough for the “hard-working” staffers, so it’s been increased again from $203,700 to $212,000. Where can I apply?
It’s so easy (and feels good) to give other people’s money away. Is this a parting shot or a “keep quiet” gift?
I don’t believe she has malicious intentions, but at the very least she’s been thoughtless when considering the ramifications of how the overwhelming majority of her votes affect the very people who elected her.
His loyalty is to himself and himself alone. He has neither the energy nor the ability to make complex decisions.
Fundamentally, if an election is taxpayer-funded, I should be allowed to vote in it. That is why I will be voting in favor of Question 3.
I do not question the importance of supporting the fire department. But I do question the importance and priority of projects the City Council regularly spends tax dollars on.
Don’t just vote for someone you would invite to dinner. Vote for someone you would want to run your business.
Those thinking about moving here will be thinking how they are going to educate their children. Many will change their minds and look at other options.
Since her attack ads, which may or may not be true, on her Republican opponent, Sam Brown, are mainly about his stance on abortion, she should be able to articulate her stance.
Why don’t those in upper administration pitch in by teaching in the classroom?
