LETTERS: Voter ID foes should just be honest

To the editor:

It was touching to see the genuine fiscal concern expressed by Ebeth Palafox over a proposed voter identification law in Nevada (“Nevada can’t afford to provide photo identification to voters,” Jan. 24 Review-Journal). Ms. Palafox cites $2.2 million the state of Indiana spent between 2005 and 2011 on voter outreach, and another $10 million spent on issuing IDs between 2007 and 2010. These are impressive numbers, to be sure.

She then laments the fact that schools are overcrowded, and that seniors are trying to make ends meet. These points are not debatable either; they are hard realities.

My point of contention with her concerns stems from the convenience of her arguments. While we’re going to save money by not passing voter ID laws, let’s go further than that. Let’s get rid of English Language Learner programs. How much could we save there?

How much could we save by not allowing undocumented immigrants to get dialysis treatments two to three times a week at UMC, on the taxpayers’ dime? How much time and money are wasted in our court system due to undocumented immigrants? How about law enforcement?

Back to the original point: I’d respect Ms. Palafox if she would just say what she really means. She wants all the benefits bestowed upon undocumented immigrants to remain, while never holding them to any thread of accountability.

Undocumented immigrants from all nations overwhelmingly vote Democrat. I want every vote to count, whether I agree with it or not, but I want only U.S. citizens casting votes. At least I’m honest. Ms. Palafox, your “fiscal concern” is laughable.

MIKE MEASDAY

LAS VEGAS

Nevada lottery

To the editor:

I agree with Arthur Rossman’s letter to the editor (“Time for state to reconsider lottery,” Jan. 25 Review-Journal). Mr. Rossman suggests that a state lottery would serve the interests of Nevada citizens, fill the public treasury and provide a service to residents and visitors alike.

But foremost, Nevada citizens would not be burdened with another tax. The contributions would be strictly voluntary. It is almost impossible to see any negatives in his proposal. Everyone wins. I have been told that the gaming industry is opposed to a state lottery for fear that it would take from their revenues. If the casinos sold tickets along with other games of chance, even they could benefit.

I wager infrequently, but I would enjoy testing my luck with an occasional lottery ticket. I have seen the long lines of Nevada ticket buyers for the California lottery in Primm. Those lines could be benefiting the state of Nevada, instead of California. I think Mr. Rossman has an excellent idea. I hope others agree and the state will develop a lottery.

ERNEST H. WOODZELLE

HENDERSON

Graney and UNLV

To the editor:

Regarding Curtis G. Swarts’ letter, in which Review-Journal sports columnist Ed Graney was taken to task for his commentary on UNLV basketball (“Graney and cowardice,” Tuesday Review-Journal), Mr. Graney has talent. It doesn’t matter where he comes from or whether he’s home-grown or not. He uses his talent to give his opinion as he sees fit, and he usually writes the truth.

It may be hard for Mr. Swarts to accept, but the truth is the truth.

FRANK NAILS

LAS VEGAS