68°F
weather icon Clear

Bill gives Energy Department employees whistleblower protection

WASHINGTON — Legislation to extend federal whistleblower protections to Department of Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission employees nationwide, including more than 3,300 in Nevada, was filed Friday in the House and Senate.

Nevada Gov. Steve Sisolak added his support to the bills filed by Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., and Rep. Steven Horsford, D-Nev., to give agency employees protections that currently cover the employees of federal contractors.

Sisolak said agency employees “work under physically challenging conditions and in close proximity to hazardous substances and radioactive materials.”

“These employees’ abilities to call attention to dangerous situations must be protected,” Sisolak said in a letter to Duckworth and Horsford.

Horsford, whose district includes the Nevada National Security Site and the proposed Yucca Mountain nuclear repository, said employees of the two agencies “must know that they have protection under the law in order to hold their agencies accountable, without fear of retribution.”

The legislation would extend protections to about 3,375 employees of the Energy Department and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, roughly 1,800 of whom live in Nye County and 1,575 in Clark County.

Under current law, only employees of Energy Department contractors are protected by whistleblower laws, and only workers for a licensee of the regulatory commission are covered, but not employees or contractors, according to Horsford.

A whistleblower complaint brought by an employee of one of those agencies can result in dismissal as a result of the government’s assertion of sovereign immunity.

The legislation in the House and Senate would provide a technical fix to expand the protections.

Bob Halstead, executive director of the Nevada Agency for Nuclear Projects, said Congress intended for all Energy Department and Nevada National Security Site employees to receive whistleblower protection, whether they are working with classified information, public funds, hazardous waste or “the nation’s nuclear weapons stockpile.”

But previous efforts to amend laws were never enacted.

A 1996 report by the General Accounting Office, now known as the Government Accountability Office, found a raft of unethical conduct by managers, employees and contractors at the Energy Department’s Yucca Mountain project.

The report noted that, despite the rampant misconduct, the Energy Department was slow to respond and address conflicts of interest and cronyism.

Other reports of problems by employees were met with intimidation by supervisors, prompting then-Nevada Sens. Harry Reid, a Democrat, and John Ensign, a Republican, to draft legislation in 2003 to tighten whistleblower laws.

And Congress tried unsuccessfully to expand the protections in 2005 with attempts to amend the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974.

The bills filed by Duckworth and Horsford would be another attempt to extend the protections that would affect roughly 14,000 Energy Department workers at sites nationwide.

Contact Gary Martin at gmartin@reviewjournal.com or 202-662-7390. Follow @garymartindc on Twitter.

LISTEN TO THE TOP FIVE HERE
SPONSORED BY BEST MATTRESS
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
Greene vows to force vote next week on ousting House speaker

Mike Johnson, in his own statement, said Marjorie Taylor Greene’s move was “wrong for the Republican Conference, wrong for the institution, and wrong for the country.”

Fixing drought requires more federal funding, Nevada lawmakers say

Nevada lawmakers signed onto a letter with more than 30 other members of Congress on Monday, calling for more federal funds to help address drought in the West, which is only expected to intensify.

Biden, Trump in a dead heat in Nevada, poll reveals

A survey of 1,000 Nevadans shows President Joe Biden narrowed the gap between himself and former President Donald Trump, although Trump remains ahead.

DEA to reclassify marijuana as less dangerous drug, sources say

The proposal would not legalize marijuana outright for recreational use, but it would represent a seismic shift in American drug policy.