83°F
weather icon Clear

The Average Joe can and should attend caucuses to help elect candidates

It’s not just the national media that’s lethargic about the Nevada presidential caucuses.

Sure, the unions are enjoying their role as the sweethearts of the Democratic presidential candidates with so many suitors wooing. And there’s no doubt the unions will get their members out to the caucus. Membership turnout is one of the things local unions do best.

But when I asked nonunion people if they plan to attend the caucuses next January, few say yes.

Part of that is the caucus process is really unfamiliar to many Nevadans. Another part is that the idea of going to public meetings and arguing over which presidential candidate they like makes many people uneasy. They prefer the secret ballot to the open discussion.

At a luncheon speech recently before the Las Vegas Towne Club, out of about 90 women present, when I asked for a show of hands from those who planned to attend either the Democratic or Republican caucuses next January, only about 15 raised their hands.

Even though the print news media in Nevada has covered the upcoming caucuses, and public television, starting Oct. 19, is devoting a weekly program called “Caucus Countdown” to explaining the caucus process, many people say they just aren’t quite sure how they work.

Two active Democrats, asked whether they’d attend the caucus, said the same thing: “I’ll go if I’m invited.”

But the caucuses aren’t an invitation-only event. Any Democrat can attend the Democratic caucus; any Republican can attend the Republican caucus. There’s no VIP line to get in.

Here’s my prediction: The turnout for both caucuses will be dismal, however you want to define dismal. The Republican caucus will be more dismal than the Democrats. The unions will get their members to the Democratic caucuses and so the caucuses will be weighted toward union issues and won’t necessarily reflect a broader range of views.

Nevada will be a blip on the national news, with Democrats probably supporting Sen. Hillary Clinton, if early indications are any sign. But does that mean the state really supports the former first lady’s bid, or will it mean her campaign is the best organized and has nabbed the support from the state’s most powerful unions? Not sure yet who Nevada Republicans will back.

If just regular folks don’t attend and argue for their choice, then it’s not an honest view of Nevada this first time we get to have an early voice in the choosing of a president.

For those who don’t care about politics, that’s no sweat.

But I’m talking to people who do care about politics, and many say they have no plans to attend their caucus, even though they may have a candidate they like. It’s the other guy’s job.

But as I told the Las Vegas Towne Club, if you care about health care (and who doesn’t in today’s world) you should find the candidate who you think offers the best solutions and back that person, no matter what your party affiliation.

Aside from the unions and party faithful, the strongest organizational effort may be from AARP, which has more than 300,000 members in Nevada. The group representing the 50-plus crowd is urging its members to turn out for the caucus of their choice.

AARP’s efforts are focused on two issues: health care and Social Security. Under a program called Divided We Fail, AARP is asking candidates for specifics rather than generalities about access to affordable health care and prescription drugs, prevention efforts and choices for long-term care.

The parties, AARP and other groups, including the League of Women Voters, are organizing to educate people about the caucus, and pound why they are important.

But here’s my concern: If Nevadans don’t bother to vote in the actual elections, and our turnout is historically low, why would they make any effort to show up for a process they don’t quite understand?

With a low turnout for either caucus, Nevada is likely to look indifferent, uneducated and passive in our voters’ reactions to the caucuses. Just another opportunity for the national media to sneer at us. And we make it so easy for them.

Unless you prove me wrong.

Jane Ann Morrison’s column appears Monday, Thursday and Saturday. E-mail her at Jane@reviewjournal.com or call (702) 383-0275.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
Cab riders experiencing no-shows urged to file complaints

If a cabbie doesn’t show, you must file a complaint. Otherwise, the authority will keep on insisting it’s just not a problem, according to columnist Jane Ann Morrison. And that’s not what she’s hearing.

Are no-shows by Las Vegas taxis usual or abnormal?

In May former Las Vegas planning commissioner Byron Goynes waited an hour for a Western Cab taxi that never came. Is this routine or an anomaly?

Columnist shares dad’s story of long-term cancer survival

Columnist Jane Ann Morrison shares her 88-year-old father’s story as a longtime cancer survivor to remind people that a cancer diagnosis doesn’t necessarily mean a hopeless end.

Las Vegas author pens a thriller, ‘Red Agenda’

If you’re looking for a good summer read, Jane Ann Morrison has a real page turner to recommend — “Red Agenda,” written by Cameron Poe, the pseudonym for Las Vegan Barry Cameron Lindemann.

Las Vegas woman fights to stop female genital mutilation

Selifa Boukari McGreevy wants to bring attention to the horrors of female genital mutilation by sharing her own experience. But it’s not easy to hear. And it won’t be easy to read.

Biases of federal court’s Judge Jones waste public funds

Nevada’s most overturned federal judge — Robert Clive Jones — was overturned yet again in one case and removed from another because of his bias against the U.S. government.

Don’t forget Jay Sarno’s contributions to Las Vegas

Steve Wynn isn’t the only casino developer who deserves credit for changing the face of Las Vegas. Jay Sarno, who opened Caesars Palace in 1966 and Circus Circus in 1968, more than earned his share of credit too.

John Momot’s death prompts memories of 1979 car fire

Las Vegas attorney John Momot Jr. was as fine a man as people said after he died April 12 at age 74. I liked and admired his legal abilities as a criminal defense attorney. But there was a mysterious moment in Momot’s past.