46°F
weather icon Partly Cloudy

Payment portals on HOA websites not required

Updated June 17, 2024 - 5:07 pm

Q: I’m writing to you about your recent column and Senate Bill 378. If I read the bill correctly, it is now optional for a homeowners’ association to provide online electronic assessment payments. Your report said otherwise.

Also, (I understand) the costly cyber-insurance is unnecessary if there is no online assessment payment offered by the association. I am wondering, if this is only the debit card or credit card transactions.

If the law no longer requires our association to provide online electronic payments, I will be pushing the board to eliminate it from our website, and cancel the cyber insurance that increased our insurance bill by $900.

A: Per SB378, entities processing homeowner payments are now required to maintain a minimum of $5 million in cybersecurity insurance that provides coverage for losses arising out of or relating to data breaches, unauthorized intrusions into an information system, computer viruses, ransomware, identity theft and similar exposures. Associations offering online payment services, even when offered through a portal that is processed by an insured bank, must also maintain certain minimum cyber-insurance amounts to protect the association and its members from any cyber-theft-related claims. ($250,000 for an association of 150 units or fewer, units from 150 to 250 $500,000, and units 250 units or more $1 million.)

SB378 also expressly imposes data protection requirements under Nevada Revised Statutes 603A.010 to NRS 603A.290. SB378 imposes the protection for personal information requirements such as bank account numbers, credit card numbers, usernames and unique identifiers including passwords combined with e-mails.

NRS 603A.040 defines personal information to mean a natural person’s first name or first initial and last name in combination with any or more of the following data elements when the name and data elements are not encrypted, such as social security number, driver’s license or identification card and medical identification number.

Under SB378, an association will no longer be forced to use an online payment portal for association payments. Instead, SB378 expressly requires an association board to perform a cost-benefit analysis as to whether an online payment system makes sense for a particular association. An analysis would involve considering such issues as cost of obtaining cybersecurity insurance, benefits of online payment accessibility, liabilities for cyber-theft claims, expenses of maintaining such systems and other related concerns.

In your case, before eliminating a cost of $900 for cyber-insurance (in my opinion, that is a good deal for the protection), your board should review the laws with legal counsel and their CPA representative.

Q: We live in a gated age-qualified community in Mesquite. We were recently awakened by landscapers with loud blowers at 6 a.m. I contacted the management company and was told that the landscapers were starting at 5 a.m. to avoid the heat. Is there anything that can be done about this?

A: Unless Mesquite or Clark County has an ordinance that prohibits contractors for starting work earlier than 6 a.m., the landscapers can begin their work in your community. Given the heat dome and the higher than normal heat for June, it is in the best interest for the landscapers to start their work earlier. It may be inconvenient for homeowners, but it definitely is in the interest of the workers’ health.

Barbara Holland, CPM, is an author, educator and expert witness on real estate issues pertaining to management and brokerage. Questions may be sent to holland744o@gmail.com.

MOST READ
Exco Sidebar
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
MORE STORIES
THE LATEST
Federal ruling temporarily blocks Corporate Transparency Act

Community Associations Institute applauds the Dec. 3 decision by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Garland, et al. to issue a preliminary nationwide injunction against the Corporate Transparency Act.

Disabled vet’s wife upset about flags improperly displayed

You may want to contact one of the local branch offices of the United States Armed Forces for assistance. Perhaps you could obtain a formal letter from them concerning the flying of the United States flag.

Here is what the law says about service animals

Your board can contact the local Department of Housing and Urban Development office to discuss the specifics of your association, such as these dogs who may possess a possible threat to another individual.

Pahrump community has questions about new development

Under Nevada Revised Statutes 116.3108 (2), an association shall hold a special meeting of the unit owners to address any matter affecting the community if at least 10 percent or any lower percentage specified in the bylaws of the total number of votes in the association request that the secretary call such a meeting.

HOA assessments keep increasing

You would need to review the governing documents of the association as to the percent increase the board can assess, with or without homeowner approval.

Legal action continues over Corporate Transparency Act’s reach

Thomas M. Skiba, CAE, is the CEO for Community Associations Institute. In today’s column he gives a very important update regarding Community Associations Institute v. U.S. Department of Treasury. This challenges the Corporate Transparency Act and its applicability to community associations nationwide.

Trash days always seem to be windy days

You could write a personal letter to each board member asking them to address the trash issue by proposing a regulation that all trash must be in containers or in proper trash bags.

HOA board cannot arbitrary enforce violations

Under subsection 4 of this law, the board’s decision to enforce one set of circumstances does not prevent the board from taking enforcement action under another set of circumstances but the board may not be arbitrary or capricious in taking enforcement action.

HOA board members must disclose conflict of interest

Under the law, each HOA board candidate must make a good faith effort to disclose any financial, business, professional or personal relationship or interest that would result or appeal to a reasonable person to result in potential conflict of interest in serving on the board.