No lease agreement likely before NFL meeting on Raiders relocation
It appears it isn’t going to matter that the Oakland Raiders and the Las Vegas Stadium Authority won’t have a lease agreement in place when NFL owners meet in Phoenix at the end of the month to consider relocation of the team to Southern Nevada.
The nine-member board, as expected, discussed details of a lease on Thursday but took no vote, and the authority board won’t meet again until after NFL owners gather March 26-29 to consider the team’s relocation.
Authority board Chairman Steve Hill said he believes the Raiders are confident enough in what they completed earlier this week — a loan agreement with Bank of America — that they will be able to take their relocation request to owners as planned.
The Raiders must get affirmative votes from 24 of 32 NFL team owners to approve relocation.
“My sense is that the approval will probably come, if it comes, with some conditions around what’s important to the NFL around the content of what that lease would be,” Hill said after the meeting.
“As we went through the process of talking to the attorneys, we asked them questions along those lines. They said the requirements that the NFL puts on that are reasonable and the NFL certainly functions in a businesslike manner,” Hill added. “They’re not trying to be overly intrusive. They just want to make sure that their interests are protected as well.”
Hill added that “we’re hoping it will happen at the end of March, but that’s for the Raiders and the NFL to deal with.”
If a vote doesn’t come in March, it could occur at another owners meeting in May in Chicago.
Representatives of the Raiders did not attend Thursday’s meeting but issued a statement that was read at the meeting by Jeremy Aguero, a principal for Las Vegas-based Applied Analysis, which serves as staff to the Stadium Authority.
The statement affirmed what the Raiders said earlier this week — that they had had reached a financing agreement with Bank of America for their share of construction costs.
“Financing for the project has been secured as the Raiders informed the Stadium Authority board that they would in the last Stadium Authority board meeting,” Aguero read from the statement.
The Raiders haven’t reported the amount of the loan. The Stadium Authority board’s lead attorney, Mark Arnold of Houston-based Andrews Kurth Kenyon, said he hasn’t seen the loan agreement between the Raiders and Bank of America, but loans of that type commonly are secured by revenue generated by stadium operations.
“The collateral typically is the revenue from what here is called the ‘stadium events company,’” Arnold said. “Their net operating income goes to pay back that loan, which probably would include a rent payment from the Raiders to the stadium events company.”
Arnold also said there would be a leasehold mortgage securing the real estate position. That would be required because if there is a default under the loan, the lender would want to foreclose and take the tenant’s position in the stadium so it could generate the revenue or put somebody in there who could.
It’s unclear whether the Raiders would become the events company or hire a third party that has experience managing a stadium or arena.
Regardless of who manages the stadium, the Stadium Authority will own the land on which the stadium stands. One of the stipulations of Senate Bill 1 is that the team acquire the property and give it to the Stadium Authority at no cost.
Contact Richard N. Velotta at rvelotta@reviewjournal.com or 702-477-3893. Follow @RickVelotta on Twitter.
RELATED
Securing stadium financing for Raiders trumps meeting on lease
RTC officials want Raiders to pay for proposed stadium road projects
NFL considers Sam Boyd Stadium, relocation fee in Raiders’ move to Las Vegas
Raiders’ Las Vegas stadium gets boost from Bank of America
Details of lease agreement between Las Vegas officials, Raiders emerging
Rent not always key indicator of NFL stadium deals
DETAILS IN THE LEASE AGREEMENT
The Las Vegas Stadium Authority Board spent more than an hour going over details of what the lease agreement between the authority and the team will say.
It hasn’t been determined whether the Raiders, an affiliate of Mark Davis’ family or a third-party management company with experience operating stadiums and arenas would serve as the so-called “stadium events company.”
But here are some of the details discussed Thursday:
*The events company would collect all revenue or negotiate a shared-revenue contract for all events scheduled at the venue. But while the company gets all the money, it also has the responsibility for upkeep and maintenance.
*A key part of the lease will involve UNLV’s use of the venue, some of which is spelled out in Senate Bill 1. Details will include the optics of the field surface and the appearance of team colors and visual displays throughout the building. The legislation and UNLV are firm that the facility look like a Rebel home field.
*The field surface may become a part of a separate stadium development agreement. When that agreement is drafted, it could include technology that would slide turf or artificial surfaces onto the stadium floor with different colored logos and symbols included.
*Pour contracts could be an issue. If the Raiders have deals with Coke and UNLV has a relationship with Pepsi, the two sides would have to find agreement or compromise for the long term.
WHAT’S IN A NAME?
A housekeeping matter that took about a minute to complete at Thursday’s meeting was approval of a resolutiondesignating the name of the decision-making board.
Ever since it began operating, most have referred to it as the “Las Vegas Stadium Authority.” However, some documentsand even a swearing-in ceremony made reference to the “Clark County Stadium Authority.”
The resolution noted that most people are more familiar with the Las Vegas name than Clark County and the unanimousvote confirmed that.
Chairman Steve Hill indicated he was happy with the decision.
“Clark County Raiders just doesn’t sound the same,” he quipped.
