60°F
weather icon Mostly Clear

EDITORIAL: Presidential debate two-step: The more the merrier

With Joe Biden now locked in the basement, Donald Trump and Kamala Harris are engaged in a two-step over where and when to debate. The standoff reflects poorly on both campaigns and on the state of American politics.

Mr. Trump has appeared in one debate — a June performance on CNN at which the doddering Mr. Biden sealed his own fate. Panicked Democrats responded by sending the president to the showers and replacing him with Ms. Harris.

Mr. Trump and Mr. Biden had previously agreed to a second debate on Sept. 10 to be hosted by ABC. Now that Mr. Biden is out of the picture, however, Mr. Trump has other thoughts. He says he instead wants to debate Ms. Harris on Fox News on Sept. 4. The Harris campaign, of course, wants no part of that.

But here’s a radical thought. How about both? And how about adding Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to the stage, along with any other candidate who appears on enough state ballots to win the Electoral College?

It is a blight on many modern-day politicians that they cower at the challenge of a potentially hostile audience or questioner. Insisting on only controlled or friendly environments — and embracing a two-party monopoly on the debate process — reveals a lack of intellectual confidence and is the opposite of statesmanship. It is certainly no way to build trust or an accord with voters.

Mr. Trump, to his credit, did agree to the Biden debate on CNN, a network not known for regarding the former president with warmth. He also recently spoke at the annual conference of the National Association of Black Journalists, many members of which are openly hostile to his existence. Ms. Harris, meanwhile, has been kept on a short lease since Democrats unceremoniously tossed Mr. Biden out the back door of the campaign bus.

The Harris campaign accused Mr. Trump of “running scared” regarding debates. It’s an odd charge from a candidate who hasn’t made an unscripted media appearance since being anointed the Democratic standard-bearer.

Mr. Trump should gain the upper hand and agree to the Sept. 10 ABC event and then insist on a second debate with Ms. Harris on Fox News. If the vice president refuses to attend the latter, it would speak volumes about her courage and mettle. If she’s hesitant to answer demanding questions about her record or agenda, she’s in the wrong line of work and is ill-prepared to handle the rigors of the toughest job in the world.

MOST READ
Exco Sidebar
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
MORE STORIES
THE LATEST
EDITORIAL: The blue state blues

If blue states want to stop losing residents to red states, they should adopt red state policies.

EDITORIAL: Democrats are quickly back for more

Ms. Cannizzaro assures the taxpayers that, by paying for universal pre-K, “we’re going to see that benefit for years to come.” This is wishful thinking.

COMMENTARY: Smile, they’re monitoring your every move

The issue has become more relevant in Nevada of late, as Henderson and Las Vegas police have installed license plate readers throughout town, and the Legislature will likely again take up the issue of using camera technology to track down red-light runners.