77°F
weather icon Mostly Clear

RUBEN NAVARETTE JR.: In immigration debate, both parties put politics first and immigrants last

The more you do something, the better you’re supposed to get at it. But that axiom doesn’t apply to talking about immigration.

Republicans can’t stop droning on about what they insist is an “invasion” along our southern border with Mexico. Their basic message: “The situation on the U.S.-Mexico border — and U.S. immigration policy as a whole — is a chaotic mess, and it’s all the fault of Democrats. Elect us, and we’ll fix everything.”

That line is easier to buy if you’re not keeping score at home and don’t have a clear recollection of the past. Things weren’t much better when Republicans controlled the House, the Senate and the Oval Office.

Oh, Republicans talk tough on the campaign trail. But once in power, they take care of their benefactors in big business, whose only problem with illegal immigration is there isn’t enough of it. Undocumented workers come in handy when employers combat labor shortages, caused by — among other things — the fact that many employers don’t treat their workers well or pay them enough.

Republicans claim that their obsession with illegal immigration is motivated by a devotion to the rule of law.

That’s laughable. Conservatives still downplay or refuse to investigate the events of Jan. 6, when a pro-Trump mob attacked officers from the U.S. Capitol Police Department and the Washington Metropolitan Police Department and threatened in some cases to kill officers with their own guns.

Republicans have long been at war with the rule of law. By taking employer sanctions off the table, Republican lawmakers have — during the crafting of immigration reform bills in 1996, 2006-2007, and 2013 — protected those who break the law by knowingly hiring illegal immigrants.

The only reason that Republicans keep talking about illegal immigration is that they get lots of political mileage from the issue.

Republicans scare white folks into thinking that hordes of brown folks are coming to invade their homes, rob them of their stuff, ravish their wives and daughters, get their kids hooked on drugs and destroy their quality of life.

As if. Look around any well-to-do suburb in America, and you’ll quickly see why the No. 1 employer of illegal immigrants isn’t agriculture or restaurants but the U.S. household. Often, it’s brown people — such as immigrants from Mexico, Guatemala or El Salvador — who make a better quality of life for white folks.

Instead of constantly shouting “Get out!”, a simple “Thank you” every now and then would be muy bueno.

Yet, Republicans refuse to acknowledge the obvious: that many Americans are addicted to undocumented immigrant labor because it makes their lives cushier, that jobs currently being done by the undocumented would never be done by U.S. workers, that the U.S. economy would flounder without undocumented immigrants and that Americans’ work ethic is weak but their sense of entitlement is strong.

The more Republicans talk about immigration, the more sour notes they hit.

And what do Democrats do about this? Nothing. That is, they offer nothing in response. They just go to Latinos and say: “Vote for us. We’re not Republicans.”

Oh, Democrats like to talk softly when they’re out on the campaign trail pandering to Latino voters. But once they’re in power, they swing a big stick. They rope local police into enforcing federal immigration law, put refugee kids in cages, ratchet up deportations and militarize the border. They also take care of their benefactors in organized labor, where many rank-and-file oppose higher levels of immigration and legalizing the undocumented because they fear competition.

All the while, Democrats do everything they can to avoid the accusation that they’re soft on immigration — even if it means overcompensating by being extra tough. Confused about what to do, they often do nothing.

The last comprehensive immigration reform bill worth its salt — the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act — was signed into law by a Republican, President Ronald Reagan.

To paraphrase The Gipper, Washington is not the solution to the immigration problem. It is the problem.

Ruben Navarrette’s email address is ruben@rubennavarrette.com. His podcast, “Ruben in the Center,” is available through every podcast app.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Where were the banks in the Donald Trump saga?

It is the bank’s full responsibility to fully vet people or businesses that are applying for loans. If bank officials are operating in a criminal, lazy or unethical way, they should be the ones on trial.

LETTER: Joe Biden and Iran

With the threat of an Iranian attack on Israel, the Biden administration issued it’s most terrifying single-word directive to Iran, “Don’t.” Unfortunately, Iran did.