LETTER: Originalism and the Constitution

BJ Soper looks at a copy of the U.S. Constitution. (Washington Post photo by Matt McClain)

In her recent letter, Linda Clocks left out one point about “originalism.” She said that women and slaves weren’t protected in the Constitution and asked whether those laws should be enforced today. But she ignores that the Constitution was changed through an amendment process. If people want to argue that laws should be written based on a “living Constitution,” then what’s the point of having an amendment process?

.....We hope you appreciate our content. Subscribe Today to continue reading this story, and all of our stories.
Limited Time Offer!
Our best offer of the year. Unlock unlimited digital access today with this special offer!!
99¢ for six months
Exit mobile version